![]()
I would probably like the PA800 very much. much in the same way I like the MZ2000s, which is my main reason for keepin the MZ. I came away thinking that it has good acoustic sounds different than the Yamaha sounds but not necessarily better. First impression was that it reminded me a lot of the PA80, albeit with a few new styles and sounds. I did demo it once when it first came out but I really wasn't able to go very deep into the OS. #STYLE KORG PA 800 SOFTWARE MANUAL#If you get a chance, check one out, or at least have a look thru a manual, including the extended manual that has info on the groove function. #STYLE KORG PA 800 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE#of what my One Man Band software could do in a keyboard, plus it's got pads. The keyboard is so flexible, you could virtually use a fill as an intro & vice versa, tap a fill, intro, ending,twice, they keep repeating like a variation. Didn't realize it could actually store Bank & Program changes for external instruments in it's sts's.Īctually discovered something odd the other day, i thought we were limited to 1 bar fills, not the case. Could never work out how you were able to control your softsynths from your korg, now I know. The controller capabilities are pretty good. Had a brief look at the function, but haven't gotten round to working it out yet. You also wouldn't have had the new "Guitar Mode". Haven't done that many yet, but being able to use audio drum loops & slice them for use in pads & styles is rather good. ![]() Create pads from midifiles, create pads from internal styles. You hit pad on beat 2 of the bar in a style, the pad starts on beat 2 of it's bar rather than from the beginning. ![]() They continue on from anywhere in the bar. The multi pads work better than on a psr. I prefer opinions on the differences between the PA80 an PA800. are great for those who use and swear by them. I'm sure the Rolands, Ketrons, Mediastations. What else am I missing.? difference wise between the two ? I have no interest whatsoever in seeing the my "arranger is better than yours" responses. I wish to hear only why it's worth (or not) worth to go from the PA80 to 800. I don't know how big a deal that will be for me. I realize that media / storage device access is mcuh improved. Multipads that are actually useful ? Important to me as the PA80's are only useful to me as "on / off midi controllers. Styles that have better fills ( do the fills match the variations better ? ) I've always been of the opinion that dedicated samplers are the way to go for me.īetter sounds overall ? But is there a big enough difference for me ? I don't care much about sampling capabilities. I should also let it out that I am probably one of the few that prefers the Korg OS over Yamaha's. Also, my PA80 has a 5 gb Hard Drive that still has about 4 gb free. I don't care all that much about the Vocalizer. I can edit all from within and don't have to be hooked up to a computer at all to do detailed editing. I kept the PA80 because I find the synth sounds an the editing engine to be more to my liking than either of the Yamaha boards I have. The plug-ins is one of the main reasons I did not unload my ES altogether in the past. #STYLE KORG PA 800 SOFTWARE UPGRADE#I elected not to upgrade to the Motif XS when I became aware that I could not use my AN150 and VL15 plug-ins in it. I have oodles of software and samples to supplement as well. I won't debate that here because I trust what I hear and know what I like to hear. The acoustic sounds are as good for my needs as any other hardware board. In spite of what I read here, the T2 for me is an excellent board. I have a Tyros 2 an Motif ES also, and have no intention of parting with either at this time. ![]() ![]() I cant stop it from receiving it.I know even before we discuss this that ultimately only I can decide. In other words midi out info is being received by the same track i am using in GB info that is obviously coming from another track. Is anyone able to tell me what exact and fixed parameters i should be setting on the PA800 so that i can control just one midi track in GB and play the arranger without that same track receiving other midi channel data causing it to sound like a drum machine. piano ) and the clanging of the internal software instrument ( the piano ) is unstoppable unless i go into global midi and fiddle with the controls. I find that if i run the arranger in style mode the midi out information from the PA 800 is sending this information to that same track in GARAGEBAND ( e.g. If i am controlling via midi track 1 piano its fine #STYLE KORG PA 800 SOFTWARE PROFESSIONAL#What a great move it was to trade in the M3 for this beauty PA 800 a professional arranger. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |